World Cup 2026 Group D: USA, Paraguay, Australia and Turkey

The USA play at home in front of some of the loudest crowds the tournament will see. Whether that pressure helps or hurts them is one question. The other — and the one your pool actually turns on — is which of the three remaining sides takes second.

Create a Free World Cup Pool in 30 Seconds
USA
Co-host and top seed
Paraguay
South American qualifier
Australia
Asia-Pacific qualifier
Turkey
European qualifier

Group D doesn't have a Brazil or a Spain. What it has is a host nation that's been building toward this moment for years, and three sides from three different footballing cultures who each have a credible argument for second place. That combination — settled at the top, genuinely wide open behind — is exactly where prediction pools are decided. If everyone in your group writes down USA first, you're all sharing the same outcome. The gap opens on the call you make below that.

USA

United States

Group favourite

The United States have never had a better squad to host a World Cup. Christian Pulisic is their most recognizable name and a genuine match-winner on his day — the kind of player who can produce something individual when a game needs opening up. Around him, the squad now has real depth in European football, and the system has grown from the reactive, defensive shape of previous tournaments into something that can actually impose itself on an opponent. The worry isn't talent. It's the weight of expectation. Playing a tournament in front of your own country, in stadiums where a billion people want you to succeed, is a different experience from being the underdog abroad. The USA have been the underdog in most of their recent tournament runs. Now they aren't, and that changes things.

Attack80
Defence69
Home advantage91

Paraguay

Paraguay

Tough to beat

Qualifying from CONMEBOL is not easy. You play Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Ecuador — the full depth of South American football — in a long campaign where there's no safe game. The fact that Paraguay came through that process is itself a statement about their resilience. They won't arrive as fan favourites and they're unlikely to dazzle. But South American sides carry a physical conviction into games that can frustrate technically superior opposition, and Paraguay are better organized defensively than their seeding suggests. Their realistic path through this group runs through Australia: a win there, a point against someone else, and a strong goal difference. It's a narrow path, but they've walked narrower ones to get here.

Attack60
Defence75
Physical discipline80

Australia

Australia

Dark horse for second

The Socceroos went to Qatar in 2022 as modest qualifiers and came back having beaten Denmark, knocked out Tunisia, and pushed Argentina until late in the round of 16. That matters not just for the record but for the players who lived through it — they know what it takes to win World Cup matches and they've done it under pressure. Australia don't have a player who can win a game on their own, and they wouldn't claim otherwise. What they have is a way of playing that's hard to dismantle: compact shape, high work-rate, and a collective belief that a single mistake can cost the team in a tournament environment. Against Paraguay they're probably the better side. Against Turkey it's a coin flip. If they beat one of those two convincingly and take something from the other, second place is reachable.

Attack65
Defence74
Collective cohesion87

Turkey

Turkey

Most likely to take second

Turkey are the most maddening side to predict because the talent floor and the talent ceiling are so far apart. At their best, they can pass through opposition midfields, create chances from nothing, and keep the ball with real quality. Hakan Çalhanoğlu, one of the best midfielders in European club football at Inter Milan, is their most influential player, and when Turkey are organized and running through him, the team looks completely different from the version that turns up passive and disconnected. They were competitive at Euro 2024, which proved the current generation still has the motivation for big tournaments. In a group without an elite European side, that quality should be enough to take second — if they show up. That "if" is doing a lot of work.

Attack73
Defence68
Individual quality76

Everyone writes down USA first. The pool is decided by whoever correctly orders the three-way scramble for second and third.

Where the group is really decided

USA top is the most predictable call in Group D, and that's exactly why it earns you nothing. In a prediction pool where everyone agrees on something, that agreement produces no separation. The points that move you up the table come from reading the fight for second and third correctly, and that fight here is genuinely unresolved.

Turkey have the best individual quality of the three chasing sides. In normal club-football logic, individual quality wins out over three group games. But tournament football has a different rhythm, and Turkey's history of being too good to go out in groups and then going out in groups anyway is long. The players around Çalhanoğlu need to perform, not just the player himself. If Turkey are switched on, they're the most likely side to take second. If they drift, as they have before, Australia or Paraguay can exploit it.

Australia are the wildcard. Their 2022 run was not a fluke — it was a product of a specific team identity that travels. They'll compete for every ball, make the game uncomfortable, and manufacture chances from transition even when they're not the better side on paper. Paraguay are hard and resolute but their attacking output is the most limited of the four sides, which is why I think they end up third or fourth despite being difficult to beat.

Worth knowing: in the expanded 48-team format, the eight best third-placed teams across all 12 groups advance. A side that wins one game and draws another in Group D will likely have enough points to survive even in third. Don't write off any of these sides after a bad opening result.

The host nation factor

Home World Cups have a particular dynamic. The crowd creates an energy that can carry a team through difficult moments — and also a weight of expectation that produces anxiety when things get tight. The USA experienced being hosts at the 1994 World Cup in a different era of American football, when the squad was less prepared for elite international competition. This version is different. The talent is there, the professional base is there, and the players are used to performing in front of major audiences. The more relevant question is whether the country's enormous appetite for this tournament produces a positive psychological environment for the squad or tips into pressure. Based on what this generation has shown — winning at Qatar, competing against elite European sides in recent friendlies — the pressure is more likely to be fuel than a weight.

Our predicted Group D finish

PosTeamReasoning
1USAHome crowd, best squad in the group
2TurkeyIndividual quality edges Paraguay and Australia
3Australia2022 experience and team cohesion carry them
4ParaguayToo limited in attack to take second or strong third

That's a call, not a certainty. Turkey in third and Australia in second is equally plausible, and you could make a case for Paraguay beating Australia if the latter has an off day. The honest read is that positions two, three and four in this group are close enough that any ordering of those three sides is defensible. Pick the one that feels right to you, commit to it, and let the group stage do its work.

How to call Group D in your pool

On FriendlyBet you rank all four teams from first to fourth, and you earn points for every correct position. That makes the USA call almost irrelevant for your standing — the same percentage of your pool will get it right. What creates the gap is the three-way battle below. If you back Turkey second, Australia third and Paraguay fourth, you're going with the consensus view. That's a defensible pick. But if you flip Australia and Turkey — putting Australia second because you believe in their collective football more than Turkey's individual talent — and that's what happens, you've gained ground on everyone who didn't make that call. The right move is to decide how much faith you put in Turkey's consistency, because that's the real decision in this group.

Create a free pool and call Group D

Group D FAQ

Which teams are in World Cup 2026 Group D?
The United States, Paraguay, Australia and Turkey.
Who is favourite to win Group D?
The United States as co-host. Home advantage and squad quality make them the clear pick to finish top.
Which team is the biggest threat to USA in Group D?
None of the three are likely to threaten USA's qualification. Turkey have the most individual quality and could take points off the USA on a bad day, but finishing first vs second is the more meaningful question for them.
How many teams advance from World Cup 2026 groups?
Two per group automatically, plus the eight best third-placed teams across all 12 groups. Third place in Group D is not a death sentence.

Related guides

Create a Free World Cup Pool in 30 Seconds